Due diligence and transformation, from a company’s own data

See the company as built, not as drawn.

We map how a company really runs — systems, spreadsheets, paper and the shop floor — Then we analyze the gap and design the change in the age of AI, and stay until it holds.

I run a company I invest in companies

Impacts we’ve delivered by mapping processes, showing where to fix, providing optimal design and monitoring implementation.

Process time
up to87%saved
From 100% of the original time to as little as 13%.
Process costs
up to93%saved
From 100% of the original cost to as little as 7%.
Strategy alignment
28%higher
From a baseline of 100 to 128.

From actual data, as built
With live quality monitoring and assurance
Complete AI readiness and data governance strategy bottom-up from your day to day processes

On-time delivery
75% to 95%
Industrial manufacturer, Istanbul
Measured by the client: May–Oct 2026 vs the 12 months to Dec 2025.
Audit evidence
15 working days to 1 day
Industrial manufacturer, Istanbul
Measured by the client: May–Oct 2026 vs the 12 months to Dec 2025.
Export orders screened before the quote
40% to 100%
Technology reseller, Frankfurt
Measured by the client’s finance lead: Mar–Sep 2026 vs the 12 months to Nov 2025.

Engagements in Germany, Turkey, Canada and the United States.

Finding 1: 3 variants of one official order routeIndustrial manufacturer, Istanbul
Finding 2: 26% of engineering changes agreed outside the change registerIndustrial manufacturer, Istanbul
Finding 3: 45% of rebate-eligible deals registered too lateTechnology reseller, Frankfurt

Trusted by

The problemWhat leaders face before they change a company

Leaders are asked to change a company they can’t see.

76%Lack visibility into real processes and gaps
61%Struggle to bridge strategy and day-to-day execution
88%Fail in transformation
65%Don’t know where to start with AI

AIx2 research, as presented at the Plug and Play Summit

1 weekOne process. One week. See it as built.Start with a one-week proof

One-Week ProofHow every engagement starts

One process. One week. See it as built.

Bring us one real process and its data. Within a week you get it back as it really runs: every route the work takes, the first findings with counts and owners, and what they are worth. If it is useful, we continue. If not, you have spent a week.

The process, as it really runs
First findings with counts and owners
The value at stake, in money and time
A proposal for the full engagement

The one-week delivery applies when the data for the chosen process is complete. We check that on the first call.

1 weekFrom your data to a decision

Day 1
Data in
Read-only access to one process: its system records, spreadsheets and e-mail.
Days 2–3
Mapped as built
Every case of the process, the routes it really takes and where it leaves the systems.
Day 4
First findings
Gaps against your own rules, each with a count, the evidence and an owner, and the value at stake.
Day 5
Readout
A one-hour readout with your team. You decide whether to continue.

And then, only if it is useful

1 weekOne-Week ProofOne process, real findings.
8–12 weeksFull engagementThe company or business unit, if the proof is useful.
OngoingLive assuranceChecks on every new case, run by your teams or by us.

How we get the as-builtOur Five Step Method

Five steps. From the company as drawn to a change that holds.

The same method for one process or a whole company, run by forward-deployed engineers and strategy consultants inside your organization.

01Collecting Data
02Mapping Processes and Data Flow
03Gap Analysis
04Optimal Design
05Implementation Live Assurance

Step 1: Collecting Data
Read-only connections to the systems you already run, plus the work that never reaches them: spreadsheets, e-mail, chat and paper. Where nobody records the data today, we create it.
No data? We create it.
Step 2: Mapping Processes and Data Flow
We rebuild how work really flows, case by case, how data moves through the business, and where AI infrastructure and GPU spend go, with an owner at every link.
The org chart is the drawing. The as-built map is the evidence.
Step 3: Gap Analysis
We test what really happens against your own rules, best practice and the law. Every finding carries a count, the evidence and a named owner.
Full population, not samples.
Step 4: Optimal Design
We match each part of your business to documented best-practice models and design the target processes, controls and approval gates. Your leadership decides.
Two starting points: as built, or from your documents.
Step 5: Implementation Live Assurance
Checks run on every new case, so drift surfaces as it happens. Your teams run the controls, or we run them for you.
AI proposes. Named owners approve.
Every engagement starts with a one-week proof on one process. A full engagement takes 8–12 weeks.
See the full method

Who we serveWhat we do for companies and for investors

One method, for the people who run companies and the people who fund them.

For companies

Understand your company as it actually runs, from your own data, processes and strategy. Then implement the optimal design and become AI-first.

By goal

By industry

For investors

For private equity, holdings, family offices, LPs and state portfolios that need to know how a company really runs, before they price it and after they own it.

By deal stage

By investor

CustomersClient cases, with the results each client measured

Results our clients measured themselves.

Every number comes from the client’s own systems, with the measurement window stated. Where a value is modelled, we say so.

IT and managed-services network · Canada · 42 locations
Started with a one-week proof
From assumed to proven, across 42 locations.
- Clients with proven protection66% to 100%
- Security questionnaires6 h to 45 min
- New-location onboarding6 weeks to 2 weeks
11 national sources and 42 local setups in one model, in English and French, hosted in Canada. Kept as a managed service.
From the network’s own ticketing, monitoring and billing records; baseline Nov 2025, readings at day 90. Value figures not claimed.
Industrial manufacturer · Istanbul · explosion-protected equipment · ~85 people
Started with a one-week proof
Every unit provably inside its certificate. Orders on time.
- On-time delivery75% to 95%
- Audit evidence15 working days to 1 day
- Danger-zone entries per 1,000 hours4.8 to 0.9
- Major audit findings3 to 0
12 sources, three years of paper forms and vision at six machines, all on the client’s own servers. Kept as a managed service.
Measured by the client: May–Oct 2026 vs the 12 months to Dec 2025. Safety against a four-week shadow baseline.
Lubricants and greases manufacturer · UAE, German roots · ~300 people
Started with a one-week proof
Export orders shipped in 8 days, not 14. Document errors from 11% to 2%.
- Export orders, request to dispatch14 days to 8 days
- Export shipments with a document error11% to 2%
- Batches needing a re-test or re-blend6.5% to 2%
A 12-week due diligence of the path from distributor order to dispatch: 24 findings, each with an owner. The company’s own teams built the controls.
Measured by Mirr Oils’ finance lead and quality manager: Feb–Jul 2026 vs the 12 months to Sep 2025.
Electrical and Ex-proof equipment supplier · Istanbul and Balıkesir · ~50 people
Started with a one-week proof
Promised dates kept: 68% to 90%. Every process owned.
- Orders delivered on the promised date68% to 90%
- Dispatches with a complete documentation file62% to 96%
- Quote to order9 days to 4 days
A two-week readiness check, then a 12-week due diligence: 21 findings, each with an owner. Welektrik’s own teams built the controls.
Measured by Welektrik’s finance lead: Jan–Apr 2026 vs the 12 months to Sep 2025.
Technology reseller and IoT designer · Frankfurt · ~50 people
Started with a one-week proof
Export risk screened before every quote. Rebates protected.
- Export orders screened before the quote40% to 100%
- Vendor deals registered before quotation55% to 95%
- Delivery to invoice21 days to 7 days
One 8-week due diligence: 24 findings, each with a control specification. The client’s own teams built the controls into their CRM.
Measured by the client’s finance lead: Mar–Sep 2026 vs the 12 months to Nov 2025.
Dental education and advanced-therapeutics consulting · Texas · ~20 people
Started with a one-week proof
A twenty-person company with many processes, mapped end to end for the first time.
- Faculty profiles linked to a course or event3 of 23 to 23 of 23 (target)
- Published home-page figures traced to records0 of 4 to 4 of 4 (target)
- RisksUnranked to 18 findings ranked, with owners
One ten-week due diligence across 8 sources, both divisions mapped in parallel. Our first engagement, and the method every later one has used.
Found in the due diligence, October–December 2025. Targets set in the report; delivery is the company’s and is not claimed.
Software provider for capital projects · Europe · ~100 people
Started with a one-week proof
Late, over-budget projects became predictable.
- Time to go-live12 weeks to 6 weeks
- Projects within budget60% to 86%
- Audit evidence3 weeks to 1 day
One 12-week due diligence across 11 systems, including recorded workshops. The client’s teams now run the controls.
Measured by the client: Jul–Oct 2026 vs the 12 months to Mar 2026; a cohort of 7 new projects.
See all customers